First of all, I agree with the author that the growth-oriented paradigm has been outdated.
Since the author mentioned that today, there is democracy, which is based on that every person must be respected, as opposed to the growth-oriented paradigm, where not every person is respected.
Besides, the growth model focuses on economic growth, and not on education, which means that, in India, for example, there is a lot of illiteracy in this, and as a result, there is no equality.
Her alternative, the human development paradigm is wellmuch better than the growth-oriented paradigm, but not everything she presented was equally realistic.

I will first start by giving my opinion about proposals that I thought were good and realistic and then I will talk about proposals that were good, but not realistic.
The proposals that I liked were the first one.
This proposal is quite realistic and can be realized by making education compulsory for every fellow citizen because education develops people's vision of each other and it develops people's thinking too.
What is the contrast now with illiterate people who have a vision of certain people, because they have been taught it that way.
Another proposal that I also found quite good and realistic is the third one.
I also thought this was a good proposal, but it depends on education because there you learn to form your own opinion without being influenced by other people.
The proposals that I found less realistic were, the fourth one.
I did not think this proposal was real, because although people criticize political leaders, in some countries there is a fear of contradicting and criticizing political leaders, and that is not so easy to change.