5.1 Disciplinary hearing on trespassing
In there testimaniestheir testimonies, the seven7 studentseven students who claimed that Simon Thompson
“disrupted” their meeting, demonstratedemonstrated that the disruption was not the reason
because of Simon, but rather by the plaintiff, students attemptsattempt to censor Simon.
They all concidecoincide that Simon Thompson entered the room quitequietly. They all agree they
approach Simon Thompson first. All but two agreesagree that the meeting was not
officially beginning. oneOne claims that they begunbegan reading Bible verses, and another
claimed that they were watching a video.) They all agree that, at the time of the
insidentincident, they objectobjected to the content of his flyer. They all agree that Simon
Thompson was civil throughout the entire encounter. TheirThey're agreeing that all but one of the
student —Student Six-leftstudents (Student Six) left to call the campus police accept for Student Six6, they. They all
agree that the police were called before anyone said that Simon Thompson was
disrupting their meeting. Finally, they all agree that Simon Thompson left when he
was told that he was vilatingviolating the Department of Workplace Communications policy.